Re: Zero digits in powers

*** T. Winter wrote:
> In article <1119321075.559504.308790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> vkarlamov@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> > *** T. Winter wrote:
> ...
> > > These kinds of (number theoretical) problems are beyond the capacities of
> > > probability.
> >
> > But are these problems NOT beyond the capacities of number theory? Or
> > do you want to have another FLT on your hands? How long will it take
> > before a wiles finally proves it in year 2350?
>
> That does not matter. There are enough open problems in number theory.
> Some of those may be solved at some time. But possibly some of them
> may never be solved. Also FLT itself was not very important or even
> interesting. It was the mathematics developed to solve it that is
> really interesting.
>

Tell me, ***, why do you guys think that your hypothesis is true? What
evidence do you have to support it?

I am not being festidious here. I am in the process of making a n
important point. So please answer.

Describe to me the whole scope of your (empirical?) evidence. For which
values of N did you discover that it holds?

.

Loading