Re: IMPORTANT Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:03:15 GMT
In article <1119462359.325843.286820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> vkarlamov@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> Jean-Claude Arbaut wrote:
....
> > You just need to compute the last few digits (say 100 or 200) to find a
> > "0". And these only require few additions. That's why it is very fast
> > to reach 10^9.
>
> Tell me exactly: does it indeed take no more than, say, 200 digits to
> find a zero for each n < 10^9 or arethere a few examples that take more
> digits?
My trial program was wrong, so the figures from that should be discarded.
There are exactly 242453 violations of the hypothesis in the last 15
digits in the range to 10^6, and the time was about 4 seconds. I have
to consider further (when I have time).
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IMPORTANT Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: IMPORTANT Re: Zero digits in powers
- References:
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- IMPORTANT Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Fourier and Laplace transforms?
- Next by Date: Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- Previous by thread: Re: IMPORTANT Re: Zero digits in powers
- Next by thread: Re: IMPORTANT Re: Zero digits in powers
- Index(es):