Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?

From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:55:38 GMT

In article <225974.1119543744533.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> george ghiata <george_ghiata@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> HERE it is Fermat's Proof of FLT
> Theorem:
> he EQUATION:
> X^n+Y^n=Z^n where X,Y,Z are relative prime Integers ,n=prime>2 is impossible.

I have told you before, and tell you again, your articles are unreadable due
to bad editing. That is all I add this time.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?
  - From: george ghiata

Prev by Date: Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT
Next by Date: Ethnomathematics--WSJ, June 20, 2005
Previous by thread: Probability Problem
Next by thread: Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread