Re: Shrieks and splashes
- From: "mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mensanator@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jun 2005 12:04:46 -0700
Jeremy Boden wrote:
> In message <1119714192.018782.260550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mensanator@xxxxxxx> writes
> >
> >
> >ps218@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> I think I'm getting old ....
> >>
> >> The other day, talking about primitive recursive functions, I
> >> pronounced "n!" (for the factorial of n) as "en shriek", and the boys
> >> and girls looked as if I was being even stranger than usual ....
> >>
> >> I essayed "en splash" as -- so I thought -- a familiar alternative.
> >> Nope. Still got a "bizarreness reaction".
> >>
> >> So OK, OK, how do you pronounce it, I asked ... but no one (albeit in a
> >>
> >> very small group) had anything to offer.
> >>
> >> Well, once upon a long time ago, "shriek" for "!" was commonplace. But
> >> what DO people say these days???
> >
> >Bang.
> >
> >And "splash" isn't a good choice because it's too close to
> >"splat" (*).
> >
> >But maybe that's just here in the US.
> >
> >>
> >> =================
> >> http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teac hing_staff/Smith/LaTeX/
> >
> Have teachers stopped saying n! as "n factorial"?
But "!" doesn't always mean "factorial". In some contexts,
it means "not" such as "!=" meaning "not equal" or
"like [!a-z]" meaning "match a character not in range a-z".
Saying "shreik" or "bang" or "pling" merely identifies the
symbol, its meaning to be supplied by context.
>
> --
> Jeremy Boden
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shrieks and splashes
- From: gerard46
- Re: Shrieks and splashes
- References:
- Shrieks and splashes
- From: ps218
- Re: Shrieks and splashes
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Shrieks and splashes
- From: Jeremy Boden
- Shrieks and splashes
- Prev by Date: Re: Montgomery reduction/multiplication
- Next by Date: Re: What are the odds?
- Previous by thread: Re: Shrieks and splashes
- Next by thread: Re: Shrieks and splashes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|