Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: denis feldmann <denis.feldmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:44:39 +0200
Jean-Claude Arbaut a écrit :
On 26/06/2005 12:42, William Elliot wrote:
From: Jean-Claude Arbaut <jean-claude.arbaut@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Herman Rubin wrote:
The teachers seem unable to unlearn the idea that numbers are strings of decimal digits, to be manipulated. They cannot understand that the representation by decimal digits is a derived representation and a convenience, not at all basic.
But real numbers *are* (infinite) strings of digits!
Sigh. "Real numbers may be represented as finite or infinite strings of digits, with sometimes a decimal point". I answered in another post that the correct characterization is given by properties. Basically, all Q properties, plus "every majorized subset of R has a sup". And they should be constructed from Q with Cauchy series or Dedekind cuts. I like the latter, but Cauchy series can be generalized, so the idea seems better.
Cuts can be generalized too : see Conway's surreal numbers .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- References:
- Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- Prev by Date: Re: division by zero and complex nymbers
- Next by Date: Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- Previous by thread: Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- Next by thread: Re: Euclidean Geometry in Schools
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|