Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 Jun 2005 08:32:34 -0700
Virgil wrote:
> > If there is no largest prime, then the number of all primes is larger
> > than any prime?
>
> Than any given prime, yes!
>
> Pick any prime and there are more than that number of primes.
I do not want to pick. I speak of any prime within the set of primes.
But this is the general reason for our disagreement again: If you pick
a fixed number 2n of the set of all even numbers, then there are
certainly more elements in the set. But I do not ask for any fixed and
picked number!!!
I am asking for those numbers which actually do exist in that set,
which make up or constitute that set. I am not asking for some I could
fix and pick.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- References:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Matt Gutting
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by Date: Algorithm for generating distinct dominant sets
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading