Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Jul 2005 11:59:40 -0700
mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Lefty wrote:
>
> > There is a very big difference between sets which exist only in your mind,
> > and collections of physical things which are floating around in the
> > universe. I'd like to know which you are talking about - real objects, or
> > abstract ones.
>
> Real sets can never be infinite. That is undisputed.
Consider it disputed, until you define "real sets".
I consider the set of natural numbers to be real and
infinite. I consider the set of numbers in [0,1] to
be real and infinite. I consider the set of possible
velocity vectors of a 1954 Buick Sedan to be real and
infinite.
- Randy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- References:
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Lefty
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Lefty
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- Prev by Date: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Next by Date: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Previous by thread: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Next by thread: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|