Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 5 Jul 2005 12:00:25 -0700
Timothy Little wrote:
> If there is a bijection between two sets, then their WMCards are
> "equal".
Unjustified conclusion. If there is a bijection possible between two
well-ordered sets A and B, then we find that Card(A) =< Card(B) and
Card(B) =< Card(A). For infinite sets Card(A) = Card(B) cannot be
concluded, because they do not actually exist. Something not
completely existing can be less than but cannot be equal to some other
existing or not existing object.
> However, equal WMCards does not mean that a bijection
> exists.
For finite sets equal Cards (+/- 1) means that a bijection (+/- 1) can
be established. For infinite sets we cannot draw a conclusion about
equal Cards. Infinity obeys some other rules than just common sense!
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Virgil
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- References:
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Virgil
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- Prev by Date: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Next by Date: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Previous by thread: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Next by thread: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Index(es):