Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT
- From: "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 00:29:32 GMT
In article <1046663.1120574665638.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> george ghiata <george_ghiata@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> P.S. People "sitting on the fence" and" screaming" to discredit my work
> and indirectely me forces me to present this article
> as a Historical challenge to you.Are You going to respond to this challenge
> the same as the contemporary british mathemathician of Fermat responded
> about Pell's equation? That will mean that you can not meet the
> challenge.I hope for you that it will not be the case.
You still fail to put your articles in such a format that they are readable.
I once have shown you how you could do that, but you refuse to take my
advise.
--
dik t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT
- From: george ghiata
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT
- Prev by Date: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Next by Date: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Previous by thread: About prime numbers
- Next by thread: Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
