Re: Relative Cardinality

In article <1120922952.370202.322300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> *** T. Winter wrote:
>
> > On the other hand, it is well known that pi(n) >= Li(n) for some n
> > sufficiently large.
>
> It is well known that the circumference of the circle is larger than
> its diameter. But that is no reason to attribute a number to it.

But geometry provides, via its definition of "similarity", that the
ratio of circumference to diameter be constant, at least in Euclidean
geometry. Or does WM choose to reject all of Euclid?
.

Quantcast