Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:18:36 +0200
"Bob Stewart" <bobstewart_III@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Steven H. Cullinane wrote:
>> On the off chance that "Bob Stewart" is not "crankbuster" under
>> another name, here is a reply:
>
> You are paranoid!
Well, it is surely curious that both "Bob Stewart" and "crankbuster"
post from touchtelindia.net IP addresses and that neither have posted
to Usenet prior to this Cullinane nonsense.
What remarkable coincidences!
Whether Cullinane is a crank or not, you people is nuts.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"Such behaviour is exclusively confined to functions invented by
mathematicians for the sake of causing trouble."
-Albert Eagle's _A Practical Treatise on Fourier's Theorem_
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: Bob Stewart
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- References:
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: Bob Stewart
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: Steven H. Cullinane
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: Bob Stewart
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- Prev by Date: Re: Inconsistent sets
- Next by Date: Re: Inconsistent sets
- Previous by thread: Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- Next by thread: Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|