Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: fiesh <weissch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:35:10 +0000 (UTC)
On 2005-07-13, Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > You'd better look into their papers. The formula let's you calculate
>> > _any_ hexdigit without knowing any of the digits before. Thus if you
>> > want digit number 10^100, you can calculate it easily.
>> > (http://crd.lbl.gov/~dhbailey/pi/pi-alg)
>>
>> Do it, and publish the result. I am busy with other matter presently.
>
> What WM is busy with is called covering his ass.
Hehehe, also, I consider my time more valuable than his, as WM has shown
his lack of important tasks by a vast amount of stupid posts.
--
fiesh
.
- References:
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Virgil
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: fiesh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: fiesh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Virgil
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- Prev by Date: Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- Next by Date: Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus
- Previous by thread: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Next by thread: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Index(es):