Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: "Bob Stewart" <bobstewart_III@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Jul 2005 08:46:20 -0700
crankbuster wrote:
> [...]
> "Strangely enough, this rather obvious geometric picture -- that of the
> linear four-space over the two-element field as a 4x4 array -- seems to
> have been completely overlooked in the refereed literature, except for
> its occurrence in the "miracle octad generator" (MOG) devised by R. T.
> Curtis in his study of the Mathieu group M24. Even in that occurrence,
> the 4x4 parts of Curtis's 4x6 MOG arrays were neither supplied with
> coordinates nor, indeed, explicitly identified as possessing the
> structure of a finite geometry (although the appropriate group -- which
> provides a nice solution to Weyl's problem above -- was described,
> albeit in a non-geometric manner)."
>
> Steven Cullinane
> http://log24.com/theory/geometry.html
Steven Cullinane's theory completely overlooked in the refereed
literature???!!! Hmm... I wonder why.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- References:
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: James Dolan
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: Steven H. Cullinane
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: James Dolan
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: James Dolan
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- From: crankbuster
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function
- Next by Date: Re: Probabilities and complex numbers.
- Previous by thread: Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- Next by thread: Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- Index(es):