Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank

From: "crankbuster" <crankbuster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Jul 2005 02:08:13 -0700

john_ramsden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> If I didn't know better, I'd swear this is the old negative
> publicity stunt - dissing one's own work to at least try and
> bring it to the attention of others.

Oh? You think I am Steven Cullinane using a proxy IP address? Curioser
and curioser!

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Bob Stewart

References:
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Bob Stewart
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Steven H. Cullinane
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Bob Stewart
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Bob Stewart
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Bob Stewart
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Bob Stewart
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: john_ramsden
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: crankbuster
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
  - From: john_ramsden

Prev by Date: The Beautiful Eight-Square Identity
Next by Date: Re: "Analytic expansion"
Previous by thread: Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
Next by thread: Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread