Re: Relative Cardinality

In article <1121607140.397664.282220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Virgil wrote:
> > Physically, of course,
> > no sets and no numbers exist at all.
>
> You can even better spell out your opinion by: No existing number does
> exist. Either omething exists physically or it does not exist at all.
> Leave the domain of matheology. Join mathe-realism.

If WM's pseudo-math is what he calls math-realism, I prefer plain
matheology to his mathidiocy.
>
> Regards, WM

Ideas exist and have physical effects though no physical existence.

If WM wants his own definition of existence to be limited to physical
existence, he may do so, but fortunately he has no power to force others
to accept any of his misdefinitions.
.

Quantcast