Re: unbiased numbers (Re: Playing dice with pi)
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:20:21 -0700
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:44:13 -0400, "Stephen J. Herschkorn"
<sjherschko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Look up "normal numbers."
Thanks.
Ok, I see. So my terminology "digit-unbiased" is the same as what they
call "b-normal" for base b=10. And if a number is digit-unbiased for
all bases (why should base 10 have any preferential treatment here --
it shouldn't) that's what they call "absolutely normal".
And as I suspected. they don't know much about which numbers are
normal -- all they know is most numbers are normal, which is good to
know -- I feel safer now knowing that most numbers are normal.
-- quasi
.
- References:
- unbiased numbers (Re: Playing dice with pi)
- From: quasi
- Re: unbiased numbers (Re: Playing dice with pi)
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- unbiased numbers (Re: Playing dice with pi)
- Prev by Date: Re: A question about a finitely generated multiplicative group.
- Next by Date: The whole positive domain of an M-matrix with positive range
- Previous by thread: Re: unbiased numbers (Re: Playing dice with pi)
- Next by thread: Subbases of a Topology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|