Re: probability theory applied to theology

From: David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:27:58 +0200

Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
>> Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>>It is 0 per cent certain that Pythagoras' Theorem is valid. Yet it is.
>> Your grasp of probabilities is just as deep as your mathematical
>> insights.
>
> Thank you for the compliment!

Wouldn't that be "complement"?

--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: probability theory applied to theology
  - From: Han de Bruijn

References:
- probability theory applied to theology
  - From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: probability theory applied to theology
  - From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: probability theory applied to theology
  - From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: probability theory applied to theology
  - From: Han de Bruijn

Prev by Date: Re: probability theory applied to theology
Next by Date: Re: Relative Cardinality
Previous by thread: Re: probability theory applied to theology
Next by thread: Re: probability theory applied to theology
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
... Han de Bruijn writes: ... > Jesse F. Hughes wrote: ... keen artificially intelligent computer what N is. ...
(sci.math)
Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
... Han de Bruijn writes: ... > Jesse F. Hughes wrote: ... > of two reasons: ...
(sci.math)
Re: Measuring newsgroup impact
... Han de Bruijn writes: ... Jesse F. Hughes ...
(sci.math)
Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
... Jesse F. Hughes wrote: ... when I say the empty set exists, what I mean is that there is a set ... Han de Bruijn ...
(sci.math)
Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
... Jesse F. Hughes wrote: ... then it follows that there _is_ no set obeying that property. ... Han de Bruijn ...
(sci.math)