Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut <jean-claude.arbaut@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:20:19 +0200
Le 19/07/05 17:07, dans
1121785635.289753.286110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, « Jasper »
<vfiddlestix@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Actually I was wondering about the conceptual changes between different
> levels of "setting".
> Some things that might help would be {{x}} - {x} for example. This must
> have been discussed in the literature somewhere.
Not much more than what you can imagine with "bags".
{{x}} - {x} = {{x}}, because x doesn't belong to {{x}}.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- References:
- set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- set of a set etc.
- Prev by Date: Linear recurrence: Fat men sitting at a bar
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Previous by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Index(es):