Re: set of a set etc.
- From: "Jasper" <vfiddlestix@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Jul 2005 09:24:32 -0700
Bad attempt at illustration on my part. The question still remains
however, as to the conceptual difference between a thing ...x.. and its
set {x} , the set of its set{{x}} etc. If they aren't the same then it
sould be possible to say what the difference actually is.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: set of a set etc.
- References:
- set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- set of a set etc.
- Prev by Date: Hilbert 16th Problem As A PDE Problem As A Physical Problem As A (Spectral) geometric Problem,As A Foliation Problem
- Next by Date: Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- Previous by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Index(es):