Re: set of a set etc.
- From: "Jasper" <vfiddlestix@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Jul 2005 14:33:11 -0700
Can you restate your description literally?
The notion of boxes is only a metaphor and doesn't explicitly state the
relationships.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: William Elliot
- Re: set of a set etc.
- References:
- set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: William Elliot
- set of a set etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: To Google:
- Next by Date: Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article)
- Previous by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|