Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 20 Jul 2005 03:31:25 -0700
Proginoskes wrote:
> > (Usually Riemann's
> > hypothesis is used as an example at this position.)
>
> Actually, I used to use Fermat's Last Theorem in situations like this.
But that is no longer possible.
> What if "aliens from Galaxy X" discovered the proof of this theorem in
> (let's say) 1805 (our calendar)? Does a solution exist if it is known
> by some "entities" but not by others? Does this mean that we have to
> define "exist" in terms of each individual's frame of reference?
Correct. Existence is relative.
>
> If I had discovered the proof and then burned it and was hit by a car
> and killed before I could tell anyone about it, does the solution
> exist? According to your train of thought, it would have not existed
> (until 1998), existed (briefly in 1998), and now it would not exist.
Correct, because: Nobody could draw any consequences.
But it is hard to get familiar with this situation.
I will not repsond further because my time is short and anything of
importance has been said.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Mueckenheim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: fiesh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- References:
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: David Kastrup
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: David Kastrup
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Virgil
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Relative Cardinality
- Prev by Date: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Next by Date: Re: Cone in a groove
- Previous by thread: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Next by thread: Re: Relative Cardinality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|