Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank



Steven H. Cullinane wrote:
> You're plagiarizing R. T. Curtis.
> This is getting old.
> See http://voy.com/14256/.

Plagiarism:

The "Diamond Theory" website of Steven Cullinane shows a man who is
incapable of telling the truth: a pathological liar who hates and
despises the mathematical community; a sociopath caught between the
conflicting desires to earn the admiration of mathematicians, and his
desire to insult those who ignore him and refuse him his self-perceived
due measure of honor and reverie. As such, Steven Cullinane is
constantly trying to purchase recognition when he has the funds to
advertise on google.com, or steal that recognition by lying and
deceiving dmoz.org when money isn't enough. As you can see from the
correspondence below, Jed Pack has clearly pointed out serious errors
in Steven Cullinane's calculations. Now, instead of admitting that he
has been caught with his pants down, Steven Cullinane is questioning
Jed Pack's education! Surely, Jed Pack is a more competent
mathematician than Steven Cullinane.

R.T. Curtis
12:29:15 11/03/02 Sun

> See also "The Geometry of the 4x4 square,"
> http://log24.com/theory/geometry.html.
> This contains a discussion of
> the Miracle Octad Generator of R. T. Curtis--
> itself a rectangular array (4x6, not 6x4)
> that illuminates the large Mathieu group.

Your 4x4 array has only 16 elements whereas the MOG array has 24
elements. Crank.

P.S. I like crankbuster's RAT. I've not seen this set of generators
before, has anybody?

.