Re: algebraic question
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:42:31 -0700
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:16:42 -0700, quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:41:39 +0200, Johanna Bernstein
><johanna_bernstein_nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Hello group,
>>
>>I have an hopefully simple question:
>>Let p,q be large primes with p=2q+1. Let g be a generator of a group G
>>of order p. Let x \in Z_p^*. Now I compute:
>>A = g^x.
>>Is there a second value x' != x with A =g^{x'}?
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>Johanna
>
>Hints:
>
>Suppose g^x = g^(x').
>
>Simplify that equation to get g^(x-x')=1.
>
>But since g generates the group G (what is the order of G?), what can
>be said about the exponent (x-x')?
>
>Note: For this problem, you can ignore the given relationship p=2q+1.
>It plays no role in the proof. All you need is that p is prime and
>that g is a generator of the multiplicative group of the ring Z_p.
>
>quasi
I think I may have read the problem too quickly, sorry.
Somehow I misinterpreted G to be the multiplicative group of the ring
Z_p but of course, then G would have order p-1, not p.
So let me rethink this. G has order p, right? Since p is a prime, the
group G is cyclic, and moreover, every element of G except 1 generates
the group.
Now given any generator g, the argument I previously outlined still
works to show that x=x', and again, there is no need to make any use
of the relationship p=2q+1.
quasi
.
- References:
- algebraic question
- From: Johanna Bernstein
- Re: algebraic question
- From: quasi
- algebraic question
- Prev by Date: An interesting problem
- Next by Date: Re: A Correction in Set Theory
- Previous by thread: Re: algebraic question
- Next by thread: optimization problem in L_2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading