Re: set of a set etc.
- From: "Jasper" <vfiddlestix@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Jul 2005 10:56:26 -0700
The description is what I would call formal, not conceptual. "My cat"
and the set of my cat {My cat} are different conceptually. My cat likes
milk. The "set of my cat" does not, yet the two denotations are closely
related. What is the conceptual relationship between the two?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: quasi
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- References:
- set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: William Elliot
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Dave Seaman
- set of a set etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: Without choice, can I compare cardinals to 2?
- Next by Date: Re: Looking for a closed form for this!
- Previous by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|