Re: set of a set etc.
- From: "Stephen J. Herschkorn" <sjherschko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:18:34 -0400
Jasper wrote:
Your cat is a member of the set of your cat. The set of your cat is not a member of your cat.The description is what I would call formal, not conceptual. "My cat" and the set of my cat {My cat} are different conceptually. My cat likes milk. The "set of my cat" does not, yet the two denotations are closely related. What is the conceptual relationship between the two?
Sets are collections. A collection is distinct from the objects therein (usually). Put a ring in a box. The box contains the ring; the box and the ring are not the same thing.
-- Stephen J. Herschkorn sjherschko@xxxxxxxxxxxx Math Tutor in Central New Jersey and Manhattan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Mark Nudelman
- Re: set of a set etc.
- References:
- set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: William Elliot
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- set of a set etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by Date: Re: Exact Trisecting
- Previous by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|