Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:16:58 +0000 (UTC)
On 20 Jul 2005 10:56:26 -0700, Jasper wrote:
> The description is what I would call formal, not conceptual. "My cat"
> and the set of my cat {My cat} are different conceptually. My cat likes
> milk. The "set of my cat" does not, yet the two denotations are closely
> related. What is the conceptual relationship between the two?
Please include some context in your followup message so that people can
see what you are talking about and to whom you are replying.
The only mathematical relationship between x and {x} is that the former
is a member of the latter. That's all. If you are asking for something
other than that, then you are asking for something that is
nonmathematical in nature.
--
Dave Seaman
Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- References:
- set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: William Elliot
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- set of a set etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: algebraic question
- Next by Date: Re: set of a set etc.
- Previous by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading