Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:32:36 +0200
On 20 Jul 2005 10:56:26 -0700, "Jasper" <vfiddlestix@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My cat and the set of my cat are different conceptually.
> My cat likes milk. The set of my cat does not...
>
Indeed. And therefore they are not identical (otherwise they would have
to have the same properties).
>
> yet the two ... are closely related. What is the ... relationship
> between the two?
>
Elementhood. Your cat is an element of the set containing your cat.
In symbols:
Jasper's cat e {Jasper's cat}.
F.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- References:
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: William Elliot
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: about countable set....
- Next by Date: Re: A Correction in Set Theory
- Previous by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|