Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:51:15 +0200
On 19 Jul 2005 07:55:28 -0700, "Jasper" <vfiddlestix@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> What is the difference between x, {x}, {{x}}, {{{x}}} etc?
> Especially for x = null set?
>
Let's consider x = {} and {x} for example. Now there is no element in x,
but there is an element in {x}, namely x. Hence there is obviously a
difference between x and {x}. This difference makes the difference. :-)
In math we adopt a special axiom for that, called /axiom of
extensionality/:
A = B <-> Ax(x e A <-> x e B).
So if there is an element in set A which is not in set B (or vice
versa), then A isn't identical with B.
Since there is no element in x, but x is in {x}, we actually have an
element, namely x, which is in one set, but not in the other. Hence:
x =/= {x}.
There you have your difference.
F.
>
> Actually I was wondering about the conceptual changes between different
> levels of "setting".
>
Conceptual changes?
Well we might ask how these sets are /defined/. One possibility is to
stipulate:
{a} =df {x: x = a}
Then we have:
{x} = {y: y = x)
{{x}} = {y: y = {x}}
{{{x}}} = {y: y = {{x}}}
:
With x = {} this means:
{x} = {y: y = {}}
{{x}} = {y: y = {z: z = {})}
{{{x}}} = {y: y = {z: z = {w: w = {})}}
:
x doesn't have an element. {x} consists of an element which doesn't have
an element. {{x}} consists of an element which consists of an element
which doesn't have an element, etc.
Hope this helps.
.
- References:
- set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- set of a set etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: Check out which site is going to the top?
- Next by Date: Re: set of a set etc.
- Previous by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|