Re: set of a set etc.
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:52:30 -0700
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Jasper wrote:
>
> Can you describe the difference without metaphor? (especially boxes and
> bags).
If a is a set, then {a} is the set with exactly one member, viz a.
> What is the difference between "my cat" and "the collection of
> my cat", (except that the latter sounds funny).
>
For example let a be R the set of real numbers.
Then 0, 1, pi, -1, etc are members of R, ie 0 in R, 1 in R, etc.
{ R } is another set whose only member is R, the set of reals.
Thus R in { R } and nothing else.
Let Q be the set of rationals.
Then { Q,R } is the set who's members are sets of numbers,
viz the rationals and the reals.
Q in { Q,R }, R in { Q,R } and nothing else is in { Q,R }.
Thus is much different than the union of Q and R, ie Q \/ R
which because Q subset R, Q \/ R = R
.
- References:
- set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: William Elliot
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: set of a set etc.
- From: Jasper
- set of a set etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --
- Next by Date: Re: Check out which site is going to the top?
- Previous by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Next by thread: Re: set of a set etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|