Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: "gsax" <gaurav_iitg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Jul 2005 03:57:02 -0700
W. Dale Hall wrote:
> >
>
> Try the standard Cantor "middle-thirds" set. Its Hausdorff dimension
> is log(2)/log(3), which is transcendental, see this page:
>
> http://numbers.computation.free.fr/
> Constants/Miscellaneous/classification.html#Hardy
>
> (the two lines need to be reattached to make a real URL).
>
> The author ascribes the proof that log(3)/log(2) is transcendental
> to Hardy and Wright.
>
> Dale.
Hi everyone,
Thanks for this example,...I shall try to see if I can come up with
any other objects with transcendental dimensions..
Also I read somewhere that most of the numbers are transcendental,...
it is funny then that it takes so much trouble to produce their
examples..
best regards
Gsax
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- References:
- Transcendental Dimensions
- From: gsax
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: W. Dale Hall
- Transcendental Dimensions
- Prev by Date: Re: prime....
- Next by Date: Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- Previous by thread: Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- Next by thread: Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|