Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:45:38 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:01:51 +0100, José Carlos Santos wrote:
> On 21-07-2005 11:57, gsax wrote:
>> Also I read somewhere that most of the numbers are transcendental,...
> Algebraic numbers are countable and therefore transcendental numbers
> have the same cardinal as the real numbers.
>> it is funny then that it takes so much trouble to produce their
>> examples..
> It's very easy to create transcendental numbers. What is hard is to
> prove that a specific number is transcendental.
The numbers that can be proved transcendental are countable.
--
Dave Seaman
Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: G. A. Edgar
- proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions
- References:
- Transcendental Dimensions
- From: gsax
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: W. Dale Hall
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: gsax
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Transcendental Dimensions
- Prev by Date: Re: compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm
- Next by Date: Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank
- Previous by thread: Re: Transcendental Dimensions
- Next by thread: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
