Re: Special primes
- From: David Hartley <me9@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:41:10 +0100
In message <hi68e11jo98d32juujo8bcodv9qnnennn6@xxxxxxx>, quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx> writes
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:02:34 EDT, bischar <bisch_a_r@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
For every prime numbers m and n, with n and m consecutive and n<m, we have m²-n² ending with only 0, 2 or 8.
The only digit ending two consecutive 'm²-n²' is 0... and if you suppress the numbers 'm²-n²' with 0 as last digit you see a suite 'm²-n²' ending with 2, 8, 2, 8, 2, 8, 2, 8, never two 2 or 8 consecutively... (verified for 5<m<10000).
Funny no ?
Do you see a logic or a reason for that ?
Can you verify it automatically for greater primes ?
A fascinating pattern.
The pattern is true for 5<n<10^6.
There may be an easy explanation but I don't see it.
quasi
The last digits of primes >5 fall into two pairs, (1,9) and (3,7) (depending on the last digits of their squares). If m^2 - n^2 is 0 then m and n have last digits from the same pair. If it's 2 then n has last digit 3 or 7 and m has 1 or 9, and if its 8 vice versa.
As n increases, each non-zero in the sequence of last digits of m^2 - n^2 corresponds to a change in which pair the last digit of n is from, and so must alternate between 2 and 8.
This applies to any increasing sequence of odd numbers which are not multiples of 5, not just primes.
--
David Hartley
.
- References:
- Special primes
- From: bischar
- Re: Special primes
- From: bischar
- Re: Special primes
- From: quasi
- Special primes
- Prev by Date: Re: Special primes
- Next by Date: Re: Very basic topology question
- Previous by thread: Re: Special primes
- Next by thread: Re: Special primes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|