Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory

Ack, my statement "to answer your new question I can see now how taking
the reciprocal of any two distinct primes would have been enough." is
missing the word 'not' - it seems a lesson I haven't learned it to
proof read! I'll have to make it a higher priority in the future. Sorry
again, I clearly need some practice at this.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: unions
    ... Ack!!! ... So it's gone missing. ... got lost in a move. ... again for the truth to sink in, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)
  • Re: [9fans] telnet vs. godaddy whois
    ... i'm missing something. ... i don't understand this reference to a `pure' ACK. ... with an ACK, but because it misinterpreted the standard, or the standard isn't clear. ... By pure I assume he meant an ACK with no data, ...
    (comp.os.plan9)
  • Re: [git patches] IDE updates (part 2)
    ... icside to build and AFAICS it's correct: ... ACK from me too... ... ARM folks? ... Sorry about missing your CC on the libata-wide ata_link changes. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [git patches] IDE updates (part 2)
    ... ARM folks? ... Sorry about missing your CC on the libata-wide ata_link changes. ... I think Viro's patch got an ack from everyone. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
Loading