Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article)
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:44:53 +0200
stevendaryl3016@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough) writes:
> There is no need for such a definition. Words are never used
> on their own, they are used in *sentences*. The role of a definition
> is to understand the meaning of *sentences* involving a word.
Well said, Daryl Frege.
Seriously, I think this is a crucial point. It would be nice if Tony
got it, but what are the chances?
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"Had you told it like it was, it wouldn't be like it is."
-- Albert King
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Uniform continuity of periodic function
- Next by Date: Re: Cone in a groove
- Previous by thread: Re: Cone in a groove
- Next by thread: Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
