Re: infinity
- From: "William Hughes" <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Aug 2005 13:29:35 -0700
guenther vonKnakspot wrote:
> step...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> <snip>
> > > Are you saying then that one single performance of the experiment
> > > delivers one single vase which is empty for person A and simultaneously
> > > is not empty for person B, because A does not know which balls were
> > > removed while B does?
> >
> > No. How did you come to that conclusion?
> >
> > A ball is either removed or it is not. If you describe
> > exactly how the balls are removed than there is one and
> > only one answer
>
>
> Then it would appear that you did not follow my articles. Let me repeat
> for you. Suppose the balls are not labeled on the outside but inside,
> so that person A who is performing the experiment does not see which
> balls he is putting out, and which ones he is taking out. Person B has
> a device which enables him to see which balls are being put into the
> vase and which ones are being taken out. Person A performs the
> experiment every morning, untill person B determines that the
> experiment performed is exactly the one described as experiment 1 by
> the OP. Now we have a situation in which A would end up with a non
> empty vase (he has been dropping 10 indistinguishable balls into the
> vase and taking one out all morning long) while B knows that for every
> natural number n the ball labelled n has been taken out of the vase. So
> which one is it, is the vase empty or not?
>
Why do you think that A will end up with a non empty vase?
Depending on which balls A removes he may end up with any
number of balls in his vase from 0 to infinity. A does not
know what is going to happen. B waits for a day when A uses
(unintentionally since A cannot read labels) a strategy that
leads to an empty vase. Both A and B agree that the vase
is empty. (B knows the order in which A removed the balls,
A doesn't, but the fact that the balls can be labelled means
that this order exists.)
-William Hughes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- References:
- infinity
- From: Theo Jacobs
- Re: infinity
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- From: Theo Jacobs
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- From: stephen
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- From: stephen
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: Analysis and Indices
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|