Re: infinity
- From: David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:22:16 +0200
"guenther vonKnakspot" <apacur@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Yes, and it is also possible to perform the operation "drop 10 balls
> into the vase, take one out" and end up with a non empty vase. This
> is the case, for example, if you take out the ball labelled 2*n, in
> which you end up with a vase full of balls labelled with uneven
> numbers. A would not be surprised to end up with an empty vase if
> performing the experiment with unlabelled (to him/her) balls if
> (she/he) knew of a proof that this is possible in advance. The proof
> that you can put ten unlabelled balls into a vase take one out,
> repeatedly for an infinite number of times and end up with an empty
> vase is eluding me. I would be very thankful for this proof. I am
> not saying that any answer given up to now is wrong, I am only
> trying to understand where the paradox stems from, and wether it can
> be resolved. Regards.
The first time you do something an infinite number of times is always
the hardest. You'll get the knak after a few times.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- References:
- infinity
- From: Theo Jacobs
- Re: infinity
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- From: Theo Jacobs
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- From: stephen
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- From: stephen
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- From: William Hughes
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: infinity
- From: William Hughes
- Re: infinity
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|