Re: infinity
- From: snapdragon31@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 4 Aug 2005 17:49:09 -0700
Hi David. It is correct to say that the number of balls tends to
infinity as we approach noon does not imply that the vase is not empty
at noon. That is why I say 'from a physical point of view' (or in
reality). If we have balls in the vase before noon and there are more
balls going in than coming out. In reality, at noon time the vase
would not be empty.
According to this problem, noon is not reachable. The operation is
undefined exactly at noon. Therefore, even no ball is being taken out
from the vase, you still can claim that there are no ball in the vase
at noon.
Take a look at function Y = (X^2 - 4)/(X - 2)
We know that Y = X + 2 when X not = 2 and Y is undefined at X = 2.
You can put whatever value to Y at X = 2 as you wish. It is perfectly
okay say Y = 0 at X = 2.
If Y = (X^2 - 4)/(X - 2) is an equation to represent a real event then
we would like to find out what value of Y would be when X approaches 2.
As X approaches to 2, Y approaches to 4. Then we may claim that the
likelyhood of Y would be 4 when X = 2. If you claim anything else then
you have to prove it.
In the vase example, if we only look at the withdrawal portion of the
argument then the claim is not strong. If both putting in and taken
out of balls are taken into account. In order to prove that the vase
is empty at noon, you must have to show at certain time the rate of
taking out is greater than the rate of putting in.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infinity
- From: William Hughes
- Re: infinity
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: infinity
- References:
- infinity
- From: Theo Jacobs
- Re: infinity
- From: snapdragon31
- Re: infinity
- From: David C . Ullrich
- infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: factoring probabilities
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|