Re: positive definite functions
- From: "john f. lord" <john.lord@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 16:27:48 +0200
In article <soj6f119lvfg6h7mqg2q4fdmnsei2k1aq8@xxxxxxx>,
David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Anyway, the interesting thing here is Bochner's theorem: A function
> on R is the Fourier transform of a Borel probability measure _if and
> only if_ it's continuous, positive definite and equals 1 at the
> origin. (Similarly in more general settings, for example locally
> compact abelian groups at least.)
>
Now what my question was meant to be: are there ways to verify (at least
for some classes of functions) if a function is positive definite,
without calculation of its Fourier transform or of the determinants in
the definition of positive-definiteness, as both in general are
prohibitively complicated?
Thanks,
John.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: positive definite functions
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: positive definite functions
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: positive definite functions
- References:
- positive definite functions
- From: john f. lord
- Re: positive definite functions
- From: Dave Rusin
- Re: positive definite functions
- From: john f. lord
- Re: positive definite functions
- From: Dave Rusin
- Re: positive definite functions
- From: David C . Ullrich
- positive definite functions
- Prev by Date: Re: sums of prime pairs
- Next by Date: Re: positive definite functions
- Previous by thread: Re: positive definite functions
- Next by thread: Re: positive definite functions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|