Re: infinity

Virgil said:
> In article <MPG.1d618aae41392f57989fe9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > Which ball is not covered by that argument?
> > N+1 through 10n+9.
>
> If TO means "n+1 through 10n+9" he is presuming that there is a last,
> nth, step, which is specifically prohibited by the rules.
>
> And as there is no last step, there is no ball that is not covered.
>
Then there is no point at which the last ball is removed. Isn't that correct?
--
Smiles,

Tony
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: infinity
    ... > Virgil said: ... >> nth, step, which is specifically prohibited by the rules. ... >> And as there is no last step, there is no ball that is not covered. ... mathematical revolution, no doubt. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... In message, Tony Orlow writes ... >>> Virgil said: ... >>>> nth, step, which is specifically prohibited by the rules. ... >>>> And as there is no last step, there is no ball that is not covered. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... Tony Orlow (aeo6) writes: ... > Virgil said: ... >> nth, step, which is specifically prohibited by the rules. ... >> And as there is no last step, there is no ball that is not covered. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... > claiming there was a last ball added? ... Smiles, ... Tony ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... >> Virgil said: ... >>> nth, step, which is specifically prohibited by the rules. ... >>> And as there is no last step, there is no ball that is not covered. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)