Re: infinity
- From: cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 13 Aug 2005 02:31:27 -0700
W. Dale Hall wrote:
> 2. http://www.math.psu.edu/melvin/logic/node12.html
>
> which says:
>
> # Any property which belongs to 1 and also to the successor of
> any number which has it belongs to all numbers.
>
> The author expands on this, a bit clumsily:
>
> Peano is using here a somewhat antiquated language about
> properties. We translate his word property to mean set and
> we say that a number belongs to a set rather than a set
> belonging to a number.
>
That's an interesting twist.
Cheers - Chas
.
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: integration limits for marginal density
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|