Dominated convergence theorem
- From: "Artur" <artur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Aug 2005 13:05:31 -0700
Hello
I think I misunderstood Lebesgue's Dominated Convergence Theorem, I
would like some help.
According to the theorem, if {f_n} is a sequence of real valued,
u-measurable functions defined on a set X, if {f_n} converges almost
everywhere to a function f and if there's an integrable function
function g:X-->R such that |f_n| <= g for all n, then Integral (f du) =
lim (Integral (f_n du)), the integrals taken over X.
If all the functions f_n are non-negative, we can define g =
supremum{f_n}, and then g is real valued (doesn't take on oo),
non-negative and measurable, so that g is integrable. In addition, g
dominates each |f_n|, which implies the dominated convergence theorem
holds and therefore Integral (f du) = lim (Integral (f_n du)). So, I
came to the very general conclusion that this is true for every
sequence of u-measurable, non-negative real valued functions, provided
it converges in R to a function f.
If we combine supremums and infimums, we can conclude this holds for
every sequence of u-measurable, real valued functions, provided it
converges in R to a function f.
There's something wrong with my reasoning, but I don't see what it is.
Thank you
Artur
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dominated convergence theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Dominated convergence theorem
- From: Ronald Bruck
- Re: Dominated convergence theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Tensor Product
- Previous by thread: Sigma algebras on N
- Next by thread: Re: Dominated convergence theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|