Re: infinity
- From: Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:12:23 -0400
David R Tribble said:
> snapdragon31 wrote:
> > Actually it is impossible for the second minute to be reached.
> > The process in the second minute definitely will not be able to
> > empty the vase because oo - anything = oo.
>
> Actually, any of these can be true, depending upon what 'x' is:
> oo - x = 0
> oo - x = oo
> oo - x = -oo
> oo - x = finite y
> oo - x = unknown
>
> That's why we say that it's undefined.
>
>
Yes, and that's one of my most un-favorite words in mathematics. If we defined
what we are talking about better, then it wouldn't be undefined. So, we define
a unit infinity....
--
Smiles,
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: infinity
- References:
- infinity
- From: Theo Jacobs
- Re: infinity
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: cbrown
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- From: snapdragon31
- Re: infinity
- From: stephen
- Re: infinity
- From: snapdragon31
- Re: infinity
- From: David R Tribble
- infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|