Re: infinity
- From: "David R Tribble" <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Aug 2005 15:55:56 -0700
snapdragon31 wrote:
>> Actually it is impossible for the second minute to be reached.
>> The process in the second minute definitely will not be able to
>> empty the vase because oo - anything = oo.
>
David R Tribble said:
>> Actually, any of these can be true, depending upon what 'x' is:
>> oo - x = 0
>> oo - x = oo
>> oo - x = -oo
>> oo - x = finite y
>> oo - x = unknown
>> That's why we say that it's undefined.
>
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
> Yes, and that's one of my most un-favorite words in mathematics. If we
> defined what we are talking about better, then it wouldn't be
> undefined.
Wow. You just define all the undefinedness of it away, presto
change-o, just like that.
> So, we define a unit infinity....
Which, when we subtract any x, is equal to ... what?
If it's now well defined, surely only one of the answers above
is now the correct one?
Are we also allowed to define the meaning of x/0 as well, so that
all of our limits and divergences that previously resulted in
undefined values now equal the correct number?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- References:
- infinity
- From: Theo Jacobs
- Re: infinity
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: cbrown
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- From: snapdragon31
- Re: infinity
- From: stephen
- Re: infinity
- From: snapdragon31
- Re: infinity
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: A potential series providing integer solutions to a^2+b^2+c^2...+m^2=n^2
- Next by Date: Partitioning a graph into path components
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):