Re: help polylogarithm
- From: Raymond Manzoni <raymond.manzoni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:07:58 +0200
wissam wrote:
dear raymond the imaginary term that we have in your last answer, could it be removed? or we should keep it for some reason!!!!? thank you wissam
I fear you missed one of my answers (dated 17/08) I'll reproduce it here (lightly edited) :
wissam wrote:
> dear Raymond,
> thank you very much for your help.
> as for the homework, i already did it and everything is alright.
> in the integral that i showed to you in my last question, what does the presence of the imaginary term in my integral mean? is it a sign that i have something wrong ? can i remove this imaginary term in the final answer?
I fear you can't remove it (this is a consequence of the polylog parameter that becomes greater than 1).
Some hypothesis :
- an error in your computations or in the given integral (remember the missing ']')
- the upper bound for x is 1/2 instead of 1
- an error in my computations (:-) unlikely since I got the numerical values using two different 'independant' tools)
- there's one or more terms in your problem with a complementary imaginary part so that the final result is real
- the result is not real and it's right (who knows?)
- ....
Fine verifications!
Raymond
.- Follow-Ups:
- Re: help polylogarithm
- From: wissam
- Re: help polylogarithm
- From: wissam
- Re: help polylogarithm
- References:
- Re: help polylogarithm
- From: Raymond Manzoni
- Re: help polylogarithm
- From: wissam
- Re: help polylogarithm
- Prev by Date: Re: Families of Straight Lines
- Next by Date: errors are good as long as... click here
- Previous by thread: Re: help polylogarithm
- Next by thread: Re: help polylogarithm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|