Re: Goldbach and Levy conjectures
- From: "Hero" <Hero.van.Jindelt@xxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Aug 2005 07:23:41 -0700
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Gerry Myerson wrote:
As google doesn't seem to give me the opportunity to answer directly in
this thread to cfe, i have to place my answer here.
What makes You so sure, Goldbach will be proven. If i'm not mistaken,
one can formulate this as:
For every natural number n, which is not prime, there exist a prime
below and a prime further up at the same distance from n, f.e n=24
At distance 5 from 24 there are 19 and 29 both primes. Now going up to
very big natural numbers the percentage of primes drops.
Would there not be the proof, that between n and 2*n is always at least
one prime, i would give Goldbach no chance.
And there's a question : Is there an intervall from n to 2*n known with
only one prime p ?
Hero
.
- References:
- Re: Goldbach and Levy conjectures
- From: Nameless
- Re: Goldbach and Levy conjectures
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Goldbach and Levy conjectures
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: Goldbach and Levy conjectures
- Prev by Date: Re: convex functions & right derivative
- Next by Date: Re: Gamma-function
- Previous by thread: Re: Goldbach and Levy conjectures
- Next by thread: Re: Goldbach and Levy conjectures
- Index(es):