Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: "Minus XVII" <QncyMI@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Aug 2005 14:54:55 -0700
don't spoil the other solution for anyone else
in the Googolplex; we have to stay here, for ever!
I'm not really sure what you mean, though;
trivially different solutions are "congruent,"
at least the supertrivially ones, are.
the packing problem is surrounded by irrelevancies,
especially the insistence upon "skwared" boxes.
--Hemp for Haemarrhoids (Bogart that Poultice, Friend) !!
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Minus XVII
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- References:
- sphere coordinates ,
- From: vsgdp
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: A N Niel
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Minus XVII
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Minus XVII
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Russell
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Minus XVII
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Russell
- sphere coordinates ,
- Prev by Date: "odds of the same seven-digit series cropping up twice were "virtually incalculable""
- Next by Date: Re: Combinatorics question
- Previous by thread: Re: sphere coordinates ,
- Next by thread: Re: sphere coordinates ,
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|