Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: "Minus XVII" <QncyMI@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Aug 2005 16:26:03 -0700
maybe the question of packing is better to approach
with a spherical enclosure. in that case,
the usual packing fills n-unit-radius spheres
with balls in the shape of "waterman spheres."
(Waterman is a bit of a physics kook;
he should have uncovered this, firstly !-)
> don't spoil the other solution for anyone else
> in the Googolplex; we have to stay here, for ever!
--Hemp for Haemarrhoids (Bogart that Poultice, Friend) !!
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac
.
- References:
- sphere coordinates ,
- From: vsgdp
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: A N Niel
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Minus XVII
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Minus XVII
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Russell
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Minus XVII
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Russell
- Re: sphere coordinates ,
- From: Minus XVII
- sphere coordinates ,
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: trig problem
- Previous by thread: Re: sphere coordinates ,
- Next by thread: measure theory problem
- Index(es):