Re: measuring a function
- From: David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:32:35 +0200
lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph) writes:
> "G. A. Edgar" <edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>>
>>> I've been an analyst for 25 years and I've never seen the term.
>>>
>>
>>Me neither. But be logical: If you mention "measurable functions"
>>then doesn't that imply that such functions can be measured?
>
> There is, alas, no such logic to the use of "-able" in English.
> For instance, a "reportable disease" is one which *must* be
> reported (by the treating physician). That example, in particular,
> really gets to me.
A laughable argument is not one just expressible with the syllables
Ho, Ha, Hee.
What do you call a term that can be made independent of a variable?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
.
- References:
- measuring a function
- From: David Macmanus
- Re: measuring a function
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: measuring a function
- From: Ernest
- Re: measuring a function
- From: David Macmanus
- Re: measuring a function
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: measuring a function
- From: G. A. Edgar
- Re: measuring a function
- From: Lee Rudolph
- measuring a function
- Prev by Date: Re: 4-dimensional Integral
- Next by Date: Re: Mathematical ASL?
- Previous by thread: Re: measuring a function
- Next by thread: Re: measuring a function
- Index(es):