Re: What does G?del's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- From: pa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Pierre Asselin)
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:05:26 +0000 (UTC)
In sci.logic Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Surely it is normal usage to say that theorems in a formal system
> are true?
Nope.
(Or rather: yes, but only when they really are true.)
--
pa at panix dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What does G?del's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: What does G?del's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- References:
- What does Gödel's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- From: Bob Stewart
- What does Gödel's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- Prev by Date: What should an int() function do?
- Next by Date: Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse)
- Previous by thread: Re: What does Gödel's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- Next by thread: Re: What does G?del's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|