Re: measuring a function
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 07:43:44 -0500
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:35:06 -0400, "G. A. Edgar"
<edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I've been an analyst for 25 years and I've never seen the term.
>>
>
>Me neither. But be logical: If you mention "measurable functions"
>then doesn't that imply that such functions can be measured?
Pretending that you're serious here:
The phrase "measurable function" makes it not unreasonable to
jump to the conclusion that such function can be measured.
It doesn't make it reasonable to simply _lie_ about the fact
that books do in fact talk about "measuring functions".
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- References:
- measuring a function
- From: David Macmanus
- Re: measuring a function
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: measuring a function
- From: Ernest
- Re: measuring a function
- From: David Macmanus
- Re: measuring a function
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: measuring a function
- From: G. A. Edgar
- measuring a function
- Prev by Date: Coxeter groups E6, E7, E8
- Next by Date: Re: A set containing a nonempty open interval
- Previous by thread: Re: measuring a function
- Next by thread: Re: measuring a function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|